The DJI ban blocked the next drone, not the one you are about to buy

Act on this: if you want a DJI and you have been waiting for the situation to clear, stop waiting, because waiting is the one strategy that reliably fails here. If you are buying something expensive that you intend to earn from, price a broken gimbal into the purchase before you commit. If neither of those is you, buy the drone.

The mechanism matters more than the headline, and almost nobody states it correctly. In December 2025 the FCC added new foreign-made drones to its Covered List, which blocks the equipment authorisation a radio device needs before it can lawfully be imported or sold in the United States. DJI filed suit challenging the decision in February 2026, and the case has not settled the question. What the action does not do is reach backwards: drones the agency had already approved remain legal to buy, and legal to fly, which is precisely why some DJI models still sit on American listings while others were never allowed to arrive.

Read that twice, because it inverts the way most people are shopping. The drones you can still get are the older, already-cleared ones, and the newest hardware is the part that is blocked. A model being a couple of years old is not a warning sign in this market. It is the reason it is available to you at all.

Quadcopter Bench's position is that the legal question is the easy one and the boring one, and that buyers keep asking it while the thing that will actually cost them money sits one paragraph further down the page. Nothing in this ruling comes to take your drone away. What has gone quiet is everything that happens after the sale.

Our Top Pick DJI Neo

Read Review →

Flying one you already own changed by exactly nothing

An equipment authorisation is a permission to sell, not a permission to fly. No pilot has been grounded by any of this, no aircraft has been recalled, and the rules governing what you may do in the air are the same rules that applied before December 2025. If you registered a drone, it is still registered. If you passed the free TRUST test, you have still passed it. If you hold a Part 107 certificate, it still means what it meant.

The weight thresholds are also unchanged and still do most of the practical work. A drone under 249 grams flown recreationally does not need FAA registration or a Remote ID broadcast, which is the exemption DJI prints on the listings for its lightest models, and the TRUST requirement applies regardless of how little the aircraft weighs. The moment money changes hands for the footage, weight stops helping you: paid work needs Part 107 and a Remote ID broadcast, which quietly disqualifies several of the cheapest DJI drones from professional use whatever the FCC decides next. Our page on registration and Remote ID under 250g works through where each line falls.

So the honest answer to the flying half of the question is that there is no story. The buying half has one, and it is not the story people expect.

The support is the thing that actually went away

DJI Care Refresh, the accidental-damage cover that made expensive drones a sane purchase, is no longer available to buyers in the United States. Owners discovered it the way owners usually discover things, which is at activation, with no Refresh option appearing where one used to be. One buyer of a flagship aircraft found the two-year Refresh gone after he had already committed, and named it as the thing that broke a long habit of buying the brand.

Repair is the other half. The most detailed ownership account in our records comes from a working pilot who bought a new drone precisely because his older one needed service, only to be told there was a sixty to ninety day wait before he could even send it in, and who was offered no flexibility when he asked. Pilots in the wider community were warning through 2025 that sending an aircraft away for service might mean not getting it back on any predictable timescale, and that support for older hardware is the thing that disappears first. That is a real cost and it is not on any listing.

What owners have moved to instead is third-party cover: retailer-sold protection plans, standalone drone policies, and accidental-damage riders on home insurance. None of them is the product Care Refresh was. One pays out in store credit, several cover damage but not a flyaway, and at least one recreational pilot had a claim refused on the grounds that the flight was commercial. Several owners buying at the top of the range now recommend a third-party plan in the same breath as recommending the drone. We go through what is left in insuring a drone now that Care Refresh is gone.

Here is the practical shape of it. On a small drone, the calculation answers itself: the aircraft costs less than an awkward claim is worth arguing about, and the spares that break are propellers and shells. On a large one, you are now buying an object you must be able to afford to lose outright, because the safety net that used to sit under it is not there. That single sentence should determine which drone you buy far more than anything the FCC has done.

What you can still put in a basket, and what is wrong with each of them

The DJI range that remains available to American buyers is not a clearance shelf of leftovers. It covers everything from a 135g palm-launch camera to a tri-camera flagship, and DJI's own lineup pages still describe the whole spread. Every entry below carries a real fault, and the fault is the point of listing it.

Two things that are true across the whole table and appear on the listings rather than in any review. The DJI Fly app has been pulled from Google Play, so Android owners download and sideload it from DJI's own site, and the aircraft cannot be activated until they do. And DJI's own return instructions warn that failing to unbind a drone from your account can lead to unauthorised access and to the device being remotely locked and rendered inoperable. That is DJI describing its own reach, in its own words, on its own sales page. If you buy used, unbinding is the first thing to settle, not the last.

Buying one without getting stung

The awkward part of a restricted market is that it attracts sellers who benefit from confusion. Three things are worth checking before you press the button, and none of them takes long.

First, know who the seller of record is. The storefront on Amazon called DJI Store is a consolidated listing of DJI items rather than DJI selling to you directly, and owners consistently advise sticking to listings that ship from Amazon rather than from an unfamiliar third party. Buyers of the flagship describe exactly the friction that follows when you get this wrong, including promised delivery dates that slipped repeatedly.

Second, treat an implausible discount from a seller you have never heard of as a refund with extra steps. That is not hypothetical: an offer of that shape ran for weeks against one of these listings while buyers argued about whether it was real, and it ended with tracking numbers that never moved and refunds all round.

Third, ignore the impulse to hold out for the next model. There is no next model coming to the US under the current position, which is what makes this market strange: a buyer who waits does not get a better drone later, they get the same drone with a shorter remaining support life. Owners have been reaching that conclusion independently for a year, one of them saying plainly that he bought two of the same aircraft because he had no idea how long he would be able to. Another, a photographer of fifty years, put it as the observation that there is no comparable alternative from a US manufacturer at the same money, and advised anyone thinking about it not to delay.

If you would rather not buy into any of this

That is a legitimate position, and there is a real market on the other side of it. Buyers are already crossing over: one Potensic owner says outright that he bought it because he could not get the DJI he wanted at a sensible price, and was pleasantly surprised. The honest framing is that the alternatives have closed the gap on flying and not on polish, and we work that through properly in whether Potensic drones are as good as DJI and whether Holy Stone is worth buying into.

The Potensic Atom 2 with the PTD 1 screen controller is the strongest of them: a real three-axis gimbal, subject tracking the cheapest DJI mini does not have, and Remote ID as a toggle rather than something you buy a module for. Its faults are unambiguous, though, and they are the ones that matter to a beginner: no forward or side obstacle avoidance at all, 4K locked to thirty frames a second, and a maker with a documented habit of shipping fast and patching afterwards. The Potensic ATOM SE is the cheap way to learn GPS flight without dreading the first tree, and it is not a camera, because electronic stabilisation cannot hold a level horizon while the airframe leans and there is no zoom of any kind to rescue a frame. The Holy Stone HS175D is the same argument one rung lower: a forgiving trainer with accurate return-to-home, undone by a camera nothing stabilises and a Wi-Fi video link that gives out a long way short of what the app will let you dial in.

If following you is the whole point, the HOVERAir X1 is the serious non-DJI contender and sits alongside the rest in our follow-me shortlist. If you simply want the field laid out, the DJI models still worth buying, the sub-249g roundup and the beginner picks are the three lists most people need. And if you are choosing a controller rather than an aircraft, which drones pair with the DJI RC 2 is its own small maze.

Where this leaves you

Buy the drone. The legal position at the time of writing is that authorised models remain legal to purchase and to fly, no pilot has been grounded, and the exemptions you were counting on for a light aircraft are exactly as they were. Treat any statement about this, including ours, as dated rather than settled, because the litigation is live and this page is one we keep current.

Then spend the anxiety where it belongs. Ask what a broken gimbal costs you, how long you can be without the aircraft, and whether you can absorb losing it outright, and let the answers pick the drone rather than the news cycle. The ban is a supply story. Support is the ownership story, and it is the one that will decide whether you are happy in a year.